Book a meeting
Insights

What Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/110 Actually Says About FASTER's Reach

Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/110 has resolved the critical open question in the FASTER Directive: which EU member states must operate under the new fast-track withholding tax framework, and which can stay outside it. The answer will define the operational landscape for institutional investors and custodians from 1 January 2030 onwards.

Why This Regulation Matters

The FASTER Directive (Council Directive (EU) 2025/50) is the most far-reaching reform to EU withholding tax procedures in a generation. It introduces a digital tax residence certificate (eTRC), two standardised fast-track relief procedures (relief at source and a quick refund mechanism capped at 60 days) and a new Certified Financial Intermediary (CFI) registration framework.

But the Directive always contained a significant caveat. Article 2 provided a proportionality opt-out for member states with smaller capital markets. What it did not provide was a precise, legally defined test for qualifying. That gap was left to secondary legislation, and on 21 April 2026, the European Commission filled it.

Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/110 sets out the exact methodology European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) will use to determine opt-out eligibility. For institutional investors and custodians managing diversified EU equity portfolios, it supplies what has been missing since the Directive was adopted: a definitive operational map of the post-2030 EU WHT landscape.

The 1.5% Test: How the Opt-Out Works

A member state may avoid implementing FASTER's fast-track procedures if two conditions are met simultaneously:

First, its equity market must have represented less than 1.5% of total EU market capitalisation for four consecutive years, as measured by ESMA using MiFIR transaction reporting data. Second, it must already operate a functioning relief-at-source system, meaning investors can receive reduced withholding tax at the point of payment rather than having to claim refunds retrospectively.

Both conditions must be satisfied. A small market without an existing relief-at-source system does not automatically qualify for the opt-out.

THE ESMA PUBLICATION CYCLE

ESMA begins publishing the annual market cap ratios from 2026. Because four consecutive annual publications are required to confirm opt-out status, the earliest any member state can formally establish its eligibility is following the fourth publication: critical timing given the 31 December 2028 transposition deadline for the Directive itself.

Organisations should treat ESMA's annual publication schedule as a countdown clock. Any jurisdiction showing a ratio consistently below 1.5% should be monitored, as it may shift operational tier before or after 2030.

The 2030 Operational Split: FASTER Markets vs Opt-Out Markets

The practical result of the Regulation is a two-tier EU equity market structure from 1 January 2030. The table below sets out the expected configuration, based on current market capitalisation data and existing procedural frameworks.

Member State Expected Status Operational Implications from 2030
France FASTER eTRC replaces paper CoR; CFI framework; 60-day refund ceiling applies
Germany FASTER Largest EU equity market; full FASTER obligations; CFI registration required
Netherlands FASTER Fast-track procedures apply; existing relief-at-source regime will be aligned
Sweden FASTER FASTER obligations; eTRC workflow required
Spain FASTER Full FASTER market; current refund timelines replaced by 60-day maximum
Italy FASTER FASTER obligations apply; custodians acting as CFIs face new reporting duties
Denmark FASTER (likely) Market size indicates likely inclusion; ESMA publications to confirm
Estonia Opt-Out Existing bilateral treaty procedures and annual paper CoR cycles continue post-2030
Latvia & Lithuania Opt-Out Current national refund frameworks remain in effect beyond 2030
Malta & Cyprus Opt-Out Small market exemption; no CFI registration obligation
Austria Monitor ESMA publications from 2026–2028 will determine final tier assignment
Belgium Monitor Borderline case; existing BENELUX structures relevant to outcome
Greece & Portugal Monitor Market capitalisation fluctuates near threshold; annual ESMA data critical
Luxembourg Monitor Investment fund domicile rather than large equity exchange; opt-out possible

The borderline cases (Austria, Belgium, Greece, Portugal, Luxembourg) represent the most operationally significant uncertainty between now and 2028. Their status cannot be confirmed until ESMA has published four consecutive annual ratios, meaning final clarity on these jurisdictions will only arrive in the months immediately before the transposition deadline.

What Changes Under FASTER and What Doesn't

In FASTER-scope markets

For jurisdictions that fall within FASTER's scope, the reform changes the procedural infrastructure for WHT relief at a fundamental level. The paper certificate of residence (CoR) — a cornerstone of most existing bilateral reclaim processes — is replaced by the eTRC: a digital, standardised tax residence certificate issued by member state tax authorities and transmitted electronically through CFIs.

Two relief pathways become available. Relief at source allows investors to receive dividends net of the correct treaty rate from the outset, rather than receiving a gross payment and recovering the excess. Where relief at source is not applied, the quick refund procedure must be completed within 60 days, replacing the highly variable national timelines that currently range from weeks to several years across EU jurisdictions. Custodian banks and fund administrators acting as CFIs are the entities responsible for due diligence, reporting, and liaising with member state tax authorities.

In opt-out markets

For members states that qualify under the 1.5% threshold, the FASTER architecture does not apply. The existing procedural landscape (bilateral tax treaty reclaims, paper CoR cycles, national refund timelines) continues beyond 2030 unchanged. Investors holding equities in Estonian, Maltese, or other opt-out markets will continue to navigate each jurisdiction's domestic procedures as they do today.

What FASTER does not replace

A critical point for institutional investors pursuing existing recovery strategies: FASTER does not supersede CJEU-based reclaim routes grounded in EU treaty law. Claims under Article 63 TFEU (the line of cases including the KEVA decision, which established that non-resident pension funds may be entitled to the same WHT treatment as comparable domestic funds) continue on their existing legal basis in parallel with the new FASTER procedures. The two frameworks operate independently.

Preparation Timeline: The 2026–2030 Window

Practical Steps for Institutional Investors and Custodians

  • Map your EU equity portfolio now against the confirmed FASTER / opt-out split and the list of jurisdictions to monitor via ESMA's annual publications.

  • Begin internal scoping for CFI registration in FASTER markets: France, Germany, Netherlands, Sweden, Spain, and Italy. The 2028 transposition deadline is closer than the 2030 go-live date implies.

  • Establish processes to receive and act on ESMA's annual market cap ratio publications from 2026 onwards. Borderline jurisdictions can shift tier before the 2028 deadline.

  • Assess existing eTRC infrastructure requirements: digital certificate workflows differ materially from paper CoR processes and will require system-level changes across custody and fund administration operations.

  • Confirm that existing CJEU-based reclaim strategies (including KEVA-line claims under Article 63 TFEU) remain live and are not disrupted by internal FASTER preparation work.

  • In opt-out markets (Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Cyprus, and others to be confirmed), existing bilateral treaty reclaim procedures remain in effect. No change to operational approach is required for these jurisdictions in anticipation of 2030.

The Bigger Picture

Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/110 is secondary legislation, but its significance for operational planning is primary. The FASTER Directive created the framework, and this Regulation fills in the map.

For the first time since FASTER's adoption, institutional investors and their custodians can segment their EU equity portfolios with confidence: FASTER markets, opt-out markets, and a defined set of borderline cases to monitor over the next two years.

The 2026–2028 ESMA publication cycle is not just an administrative formality, but rather the mechanism by which the final operational architecture of EU WHT is being determined in real time. Organisations that begin CFI registration scoping, eTRC workflow design, and portfolio-level operational segmentation now will avoid the compressed pressure of acting in the months immediately before the 31 December 2028 transposition deadline.

__

The content published on this website is for general informational purposes only. While we strive to ensure the accuracy and timeliness of the information presented, no legal rights can be derived from the content. We do not accept any liability for errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in the information provided. The content does not constitute professional advice, and readers are strongly encouraged to consult a qualified advisor before making any decisions based on the information shared on this website.  

Kristian Mishev

Withholding Tax Specialist

Topics

Unlock your 

withholding tax recovery potential

Get in touch and see for yourself how you can take control and optimize your withholding tax returns

Insights you might also like

JUNE 10, 2026 • 3 minute read

Dutch Dividend Withholding Tax Refund for Unit-Linked Insurers: Court of Appeal 's-Hertogenbosch

The Court of Appeal of 's-Hertogenbosch has ordered the Dutch tax authorities to refund approximately €53.8 million in dividend withholding tax to a UK-resident unit-linked insurer, ruling that EU free movement of capital principles override the domestic treatment that left the insurer bearing a 15% withholding tax that a comparable Dutch company would never have paid. The decision clarifies the beneficial ownership analysis for unit-linked structures and sets out the conditions under which foreign insurers can pursue similar refund claims.

Tax news

JUNE 10, 2026 • 4 minute read

Italy's 1.2% Dividend WHT Reclaim Window Is Closing for Non-Resident Investors

Italian courts have now confirmed that non-resident corporate investors can reclaim Italian dividend withholding tax where it exceeded the 1.2% effective burden available to comparable Italian companies. With the 48-month limitation period running, claims for 2022 dividends are expiring during 2026.

Tax news

MAY 27, 2026 • 6 minute read

SKAT Reverses Course: Denmark Extends Full Treaty Exemption to Canadian Master Trust Funds

Learn how Denmark now grants Canadian Master Trust pension funds a 0% dividend withholding tax exemption under the Canada-Denmark tax treaty.

Tax news