Book a meeting
Insights

European Commission requests GERMANY to bring its withholding tax in line with EU law

The European Commission urges Germany to amend its withholding tax laws to ensure equal treatment for foreign charities under EU regulations.

European Commission requests Germany to align its withholding tax on foreign charities in with EU law.

The European Commission announced in its april 2022 infringement package that it decided to send a letter of formal notice to Germany requesting it to amend its legislation regarding withholding tax on dividends and interest paid to foreign charities.

Under German tax law, dividends and interest paid to charities having their legal seat or the place of management in Germany are either exempt from withholding tax, or withholding tax is fully refunded. However, dividends and interest paid to comparable charities established in other EU and EEA Member States and third countries are taxed at a gross rate of 25% unless a relevant Double Tax Agreement provides for a reduced witholding tax rate on dividends and interest.

This difference in tax treatment of foreign charities compared to German charities seems to constitute a restriction on the free movement of capital, as meant in Article 63 Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (also known as the EU treaty) and Article 40 European Economic Area Agreement. The European Economic Area includes all EU member states and Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein. Such restrictions are prohibited under article 63 TFEU and article 40 of the EEA Agreement as they make investment in Germany less attractive for foreign charities. And while EU member states are not forced under EU law to recognize foreign institutions' charitable status under foreign law, a foreign charity that satisfies the requirements for charitable status and promotes the same public interests as domestic charities must be granted equally beneficial tax treatment as domestic charities This follows from established case law of the European Court of Justice, such as the Persche case (C-318/078) and the Walter Stauffer case (C-386/04).

If Germany does not provide a satisfactory response within the next two months, the Commission may decide to send a reasoned opinion.

Jeroen van der Wal

Business Development Representative

Topics

Unlock your 

withholding tax recovery potential

Get in touch and see for yourself how you can take control and optimize your withholding tax returns

Insights you might also like

APRIL 30, 2026 • 6 minute read

SKAT v Solo Capital Partners: The Landmark Cum-Ex Judgment That Could Reshape Tax Fraud Litigation

Denmark’s tax authority, SKAT, proved in the English courts that billions were paid out through invalid withholding tax refund claims connected to cum-ex trading. Yet the authority still lost one of the largest fraud cases ever heard in the English Commercial Court.

Tax news

MARCH 1, 2026 • 4 minute read

CJEU Case C-241/25: Why Sweden’s Withholding Tax Rules for Loss-Making Companies Could Face a Major EU Law Challenge

On 10 February 2026, the Grand Chamber of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) heard oral arguments in Case C-241/25, a potentially significant development for EU-based investors with exposure to Swedish equities. The case concerns whether Sweden can require foreign companies to recalculate their tax position under Swedish rules before reclaiming dividend withholding tax (WHT).

Tax news

MARCH 1, 2026 • 7 minute read

The Netherlands’ FGR Reform Remains in Flux: What Investment Funds and Tax Professionals Need to Know

The Dutch government’s reform of the fonds voor gemene rekening (FGR) regime continues to create uncertainty for investment funds with Dutch investors or Dutch-source income. What initially appeared to be a technical update to Dutch fund classification rules has evolved into a broader discussion about withholding tax exposure, cross-border investment structures, and the future of tax transparency in the Netherlands.

Tax news