Book a meeting
Insights

ESMA recommends tax information exchange

ESMA urges the European Commission to enable financial bodies to share data with tax authorities to tackle tax fraud effectively.

European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) recommends European Commission to allow national financial markets supervisory bodies to exchange information with tax authorities to combat fraudulent withholding tax schemes. On 24 September, 2020, ESMA published the outcomes of its review of the EU’s Market Abuse Regulation (MAR). While this review touches a wide variety of topics, it also addresses dividend arbitrage schemes in section 10.2. In this section, ESMA then explains multiple reasons why a legislative change to the MAR itself is not the best way to combat fraudulent dividend arbitrage schemes. However, as it is currently not allowed under MAR, MiFID II and MiFIR for national financial markets supervisory bodies (“National Competent Authorities” or “NCA’s”) to exchange information with tax authorities, ESMA recommends the European Commission to: · remove legal limitations for NCA’s to exchange information obtained from NCA’s in other Member States with tax authorities, as well as to · provide a common legal basis for exchange of information directly received by an NCA within its national supervisory activity. ESMA believes this may not prevent but will contribute to the detection and prosecutions of fraudulent withholding tax schemes.

Jeroen van der Wal

Business Development Representative

Topics

Unlock your 

withholding tax recovery potential

Get in touch and see for yourself how you can take control and optimize your withholding tax returns

Insights you might also like

APRIL 30, 2026 • 6 minute read

SKAT v Solo Capital Partners: The Landmark Cum-Ex Judgment That Could Reshape Tax Fraud Litigation

Denmark’s tax authority, SKAT, proved in the English courts that billions were paid out through invalid withholding tax refund claims connected to cum-ex trading. Yet the authority still lost one of the largest fraud cases ever heard in the English Commercial Court.

Tax news

MARCH 1, 2026 • 4 minute read

CJEU Case C-241/25: Why Sweden’s Withholding Tax Rules for Loss-Making Companies Could Face a Major EU Law Challenge

On 10 February 2026, the Grand Chamber of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) heard oral arguments in Case C-241/25, a potentially significant development for EU-based investors with exposure to Swedish equities. The case concerns whether Sweden can require foreign companies to recalculate their tax position under Swedish rules before reclaiming dividend withholding tax (WHT).

Tax news

MARCH 1, 2026 • 7 minute read

The Netherlands’ FGR Reform Remains in Flux: What Investment Funds and Tax Professionals Need to Know

The Dutch government’s reform of the fonds voor gemene rekening (FGR) regime continues to create uncertainty for investment funds with Dutch investors or Dutch-source income. What initially appeared to be a technical update to Dutch fund classification rules has evolved into a broader discussion about withholding tax exposure, cross-border investment structures, and the future of tax transparency in the Netherlands.

Tax news