Book a meeting
Insights

European Commission urges Sweden to amend its rules on taxation of dividends to foreign public pension institutions

The European Commission challenges Sweden's dividend tax rules for foreign pension funds, citing a breach of the free movement of capital. Sweden has two months to respond.

After the European Commission had formally requested Sweden to stop applying a higher dividend withholding tax to foreign pension institutions and insurance companies respectively in its February 2021 infringement package, the Commission has now decided to send a reasoned opinion (the next step in infringement proceedings) to Sweden regarding its taxation of dividends paid to public pension institutions. Whereas Swedish public pension funds are, as state agencies, entirely exempt from tax liability, including Swedish dividend withholding tax, dividends paid to comparable foreign public pension funds are subject to a withholding tax, commonly at a rate of 15% over gross dividend income. The 15% rate is the reduced rate that results from the double tax treaties concluded between Sweden and other EU/EEA countries. 

The European Commission takes the position that such a fiscal scheme under which dividends paid to foreign public pension funds are subject to less favourable treatment than similar distributions in purely domestic situations infringes the free movement of capital (Article 63 TFEU and Article 40 of the EEA Agreement). Sweden has two months to respond after which the Commission may decide to refer the case to the Court of Justice of the European Union. The European Court of Justice has already ruled in several cases that EU member states that levy a higher withholding tax from foreign pension funds, or that exempt their domestic pension funds while subjecting foreign pension funds to tax are violating the free movement of capital. Well known examples of such cases are the 2012 Commission vs Republic of Finland case (Case C-342/10), and the 2019 College Pension Plan case (Case 641/17)

Jeroen van der Wal

Business Development Representative

Topics

Unlock your 

withholding tax recovery potential

Get in touch and see for yourself how you can take control and optimize your withholding tax returns

Insights you might also like

APRIL 30, 2026 • 6 minute read

SKAT v Solo Capital Partners: The Landmark Cum-Ex Judgment That Could Reshape Tax Fraud Litigation

Denmark’s tax authority, SKAT, proved in the English courts that billions were paid out through invalid withholding tax refund claims connected to cum-ex trading. Yet the authority still lost one of the largest fraud cases ever heard in the English Commercial Court.

Tax news

MARCH 1, 2026 • 4 minute read

CJEU Case C-241/25: Why Sweden’s Withholding Tax Rules for Loss-Making Companies Could Face a Major EU Law Challenge

On 10 February 2026, the Grand Chamber of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) heard oral arguments in Case C-241/25, a potentially significant development for EU-based investors with exposure to Swedish equities. The case concerns whether Sweden can require foreign companies to recalculate their tax position under Swedish rules before reclaiming dividend withholding tax (WHT).

Tax news

MARCH 1, 2026 • 7 minute read

The Netherlands’ FGR Reform Remains in Flux: What Investment Funds and Tax Professionals Need to Know

The Dutch government’s reform of the fonds voor gemene rekening (FGR) regime continues to create uncertainty for investment funds with Dutch investors or Dutch-source income. What initially appeared to be a technical update to Dutch fund classification rules has evolved into a broader discussion about withholding tax exposure, cross-border investment structures, and the future of tax transparency in the Netherlands.

Tax news