Book a meeting
Insights

EC asks Belgium to stop taxing foreign insurance companies more heavily than Belgian insurance companies

The European Commission urges Belgium to align its tax policies for foreign insurance firms with EU law, challenging potential discrimination.

Last Friday, the European Commission (“EC”) has requested Belgium to stop taxing foreign life insurance companies more heavily on Belgian source dividends, interest and income from real estate. Belgian insurance companies are often effectively exempt or almost fully exempt (as a result of deductions and provisions that are tax deductible and no withholding tax being due or being fully refundable) while foreign insurance companies are subject to a final withholding tax ranging from 15 to 30%. This less favorable tax treatment of foreign insurance companies is possibly a discrimination that is prohibited by EU law, more specifically the free movement of capital as laid down in article 63 of the EU Treaty. Belgium has two months to respond. If it does not respond, the EC will likely send a “reasoned opinion”, which is a more elaborate and more formal request. Belgium then has another two months to respond. If it does not, or not satisfactory, the EC is likely to refer the case to the European Court of Justice. In practice, most cases are settled before they go to the ECJ.

The potential ramifications of this request are much wider than just Belgium. There are more EU member states which tax foreign life insurance companies more heavily than domestic life insurance companies. They face similar action from the EC. If you would like to informally discuss what withholding tax reclaim opportunities this development may bring to your company, please contact us.

Jeroen van der Wal

Business Development Representative

Topics

Unlock your 

withholding tax recovery potential

Get in touch and see for yourself how you can take control and optimize your withholding tax returns

Insights you might also like

APRIL 30, 2026 • 6 minute read

SKAT v Solo Capital Partners: The Landmark Cum-Ex Judgment That Could Reshape Tax Fraud Litigation

Denmark’s tax authority, SKAT, proved in the English courts that billions were paid out through invalid withholding tax refund claims connected to cum-ex trading. Yet the authority still lost one of the largest fraud cases ever heard in the English Commercial Court.

Tax news

MARCH 1, 2026 • 4 minute read

CJEU Case C-241/25: Why Sweden’s Withholding Tax Rules for Loss-Making Companies Could Face a Major EU Law Challenge

On 10 February 2026, the Grand Chamber of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) heard oral arguments in Case C-241/25, a potentially significant development for EU-based investors with exposure to Swedish equities. The case concerns whether Sweden can require foreign companies to recalculate their tax position under Swedish rules before reclaiming dividend withholding tax (WHT).

Tax news

MARCH 1, 2026 • 7 minute read

The Netherlands’ FGR Reform Remains in Flux: What Investment Funds and Tax Professionals Need to Know

The Dutch government’s reform of the fonds voor gemene rekening (FGR) regime continues to create uncertainty for investment funds with Dutch investors or Dutch-source income. What initially appeared to be a technical update to Dutch fund classification rules has evolved into a broader discussion about withholding tax exposure, cross-border investment structures, and the future of tax transparency in the Netherlands.

Tax news