Book a meeting
Insights

Dutch Supreme Court opens the door to ECJ reclaims in the Netherlands by foreign investment funds

Foreign investment funds can now reclaim Dutch dividend withholding tax, aligning with EU free movement of capital principles.

Dutch Supreme Court opens the door to refund of Dutch dividend withholding tax to foreign investment funds based on the EU free movement of capital, also known as ECJ reclaims.

Today, the Dutch Supreme Court ruled that foreign investment funds that meet certain shareholder conditions are eligible for refund of Dutch dividend withholding tax. These are the same conditions that Dutch investments must also meet for a refund of dividend withholding tax. In doing so, the Supreme Court repeals an earlier decision from 2015. In that decision it had decided that foreign investment funds are never objectively comparable to Dutch investment funds because they are not liable to withhold Dutch dividend withholding tax, while Dutch investment funds are. And because their situations are not comparable there would no discrimination prohibited by the free movement of capital. And consequently no entitlement to refund. Today's Supreme Court decision is in line with the ECJ's  decision in the 2018 Fidelity Funds case. This is a case concerning a very comparable Danish situation (click here to read our analysis of the Fidelity Funds decision). The refund to foreign investment funds is reduced by the amount of Dutch dividend withholding tax that would have been owed when both the foreign investment fund and its participants had been tax resident in the Netherlands. In other words, a refund is granted only with respect to those participants who, in a fully Dutch internal situation, would not have owed any Dutch dividend withholding tax either. Contact us if you would like to know more about this decision.

Jeroen van der Wal

Business Development Representative

Topics

Unlock your 

withholding tax recovery potential

Get in touch and see for yourself how you can take control and optimize your withholding tax returns

Insights you might also like

APRIL 30, 2026 • 6 minute read

SKAT v Solo Capital Partners: The Landmark Cum-Ex Judgment That Could Reshape Tax Fraud Litigation

Denmark’s tax authority, SKAT, proved in the English courts that billions were paid out through invalid withholding tax refund claims connected to cum-ex trading. Yet the authority still lost one of the largest fraud cases ever heard in the English Commercial Court.

Tax news

MARCH 1, 2026 • 4 minute read

CJEU Case C-241/25: Why Sweden’s Withholding Tax Rules for Loss-Making Companies Could Face a Major EU Law Challenge

On 10 February 2026, the Grand Chamber of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) heard oral arguments in Case C-241/25, a potentially significant development for EU-based investors with exposure to Swedish equities. The case concerns whether Sweden can require foreign companies to recalculate their tax position under Swedish rules before reclaiming dividend withholding tax (WHT).

Tax news

MARCH 1, 2026 • 7 minute read

The Netherlands’ FGR Reform Remains in Flux: What Investment Funds and Tax Professionals Need to Know

The Dutch government’s reform of the fonds voor gemene rekening (FGR) regime continues to create uncertainty for investment funds with Dutch investors or Dutch-source income. What initially appeared to be a technical update to Dutch fund classification rules has evolved into a broader discussion about withholding tax exposure, cross-border investment structures, and the future of tax transparency in the Netherlands.

Tax news