Book a meeting
Insights

Dutch Supreme Court opens the door to ECJ reclaims in the Netherlands by foreign investment funds

Foreign investment funds can now reclaim Dutch dividend withholding tax, aligning with EU free movement of capital principles.

Dutch Supreme Court opens the door to refund of Dutch dividend withholding tax to foreign investment funds based on the EU free movement of capital, also known as ECJ reclaims.

Today, the Dutch Supreme Court ruled that foreign investment funds that meet certain shareholder conditions are eligible for refund of Dutch dividend withholding tax. These are the same conditions that Dutch investments must also meet for a refund of dividend withholding tax. In doing so, the Supreme Court repeals an earlier decision from 2015. In that decision it had decided that foreign investment funds are never objectively comparable to Dutch investment funds because they are not liable to withhold Dutch dividend withholding tax, while Dutch investment funds are. And because their situations are not comparable there would no discrimination prohibited by the free movement of capital. And consequently no entitlement to refund. Today's Supreme Court decision is in line with the ECJ's  decision in the 2018 Fidelity Funds case. This is a case concerning a very comparable Danish situation (click here to read our analysis of the Fidelity Funds decision). The refund to foreign investment funds is reduced by the amount of Dutch dividend withholding tax that would have been owed when both the foreign investment fund and its participants had been tax resident in the Netherlands. In other words, a refund is granted only with respect to those participants who, in a fully Dutch internal situation, would not have owed any Dutch dividend withholding tax either. Contact us if you would like to know more about this decision.

Jeroen van der Wal

Business Development Representative

Topics

Unlock your 

withholding tax recovery potential

Get in touch and see for yourself how you can take control and optimize your withholding tax returns

Insights you might also like

AUGUST 26, 2025 • 5 minute read

CJEU Ruling in Case C-602/23: CJEU says Austria may deny refund if income is taxed at investor level

In a decisive judgment rendered on 30 April 2025 in Finanzamt für Großbetriebe v. Franklin Mutual Series Funds – Franklin Mutual European Fund (C-602/23), the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) provided clarity on the treatment of foreign investment funds under Austrian withholding tax law.

Tax news

JULY 22, 2025 • 3 minute read

U.S. – Denmark Competent Authority Arrangement Finalized: Implication from 81/100 Group Trusts and Withholding Tax Reclaims

In March 2025, the United States and Denmark finalized a Competent Authority Arrangement (CAA) clarifying which pension entities or arrangements qualify under “pension fund” status in order to qualify for treaty benefits under Article 10(3)(c) of the 1999 Denmark–U.S. tax treaty.

Tax news

JULY 11, 2025 • 4 minute read

Poland Issues Final Guidance on Beneficial Ownership for Withholding Tax (WHT) Relief

On 9 July 2025, the Polish Ministry of Finance published binding tax clarifications (Objaśnienia podatkowe) on the application of the “beneficial owner” clause to withholding tax (WHT) relief. These explanationsmark the first authoritative statement of Poland’s BO doctrine.

Tax news