Book a meeting
Insights

Dutch government wants additional dividend stripping measures

The Dutch government seeks new strategies to combat dividend stripping and prevent tax avoidance, aiming for implementation by 2024.

Dutch government wants additional Dutch dividend stripping measures

The Dutch government wants to take additional dividend stripping measures to better tackle dividend stripping. It is undesirable that no or less dividend tax is paid due to this form of tax avoidance. However, given the current laws and regulations, this is not always possible. Additional measures will be investigated and further elaborated in the near future.

With dividend stripping, the economic and legal rights to dividends are split in order to obtain a tax advantage. For this purpose, the legal ownership of the shares is, for example, (temporarily) lent to another party (also known as securities lending) that has a more favorable tax situation, such as a Dutch shareholder who can offset the dividend tax. This limits or prevents the levying of dividend tax.

Dutch State Secretary Marnix van Rij: “The cabinet considers it undesirable that parties pay no or less tax by means of dividend stripping. The complexity and international character of dividend stripping show that the current measures are insufficient. New, additional measures are therefore necessary.”

The government has recently investigated how the approach to dividend stripping can best be improved. An internet consultation was also held to map out the impact of possible alternative measures. In the coming period, the government will investigate and further develop the following additional measures to combat dividend stripping more effectively:

  • Restrict set-off or refund of dividend tax (net yield/tax base approach);

  • Stricter documentation obligations;

  • Legislation of the reference date on which it is determined who is entitled to receive the dividend;

Introduction of a legal provision to determine whether a person (together with related parties) holds the beneficial interest in the shares.

Further research is being carried out into whether it is possible to convert these alternatives into well-functioning and easily implementable measures. The government is also looking at how the information and evidence position of the Tax and Customs Administration can be improved. In addition, further research is being carried out into whether an additional measure should be introduced that focuses on pension funds.

International developments in the field of legislation and regulations are also monitored, because dividend stripping often takes place across national borders. Because dividend stripping continues to develop, it is also important to be able to make timely adjustments where necessary. That is why the government will monitor the new measures to be introduced.

Further research will be carried out in the near future and it will be examined whether and how these measures can be elaborated in a bill. The additional measures are not expected to become effective before 1 January, 2024.

Jeroen van der Wal

Business Development Representative

Topics

Unlock your 

withholding tax recovery potential

Get in touch and see for yourself how you can take control and optimize your withholding tax returns

Insights you might also like

APRIL 30, 2026 • 6 minute read

SKAT v Solo Capital Partners: The Landmark Cum-Ex Judgment That Could Reshape Tax Fraud Litigation

Denmark’s tax authority, SKAT, proved in the English courts that billions were paid out through invalid withholding tax refund claims connected to cum-ex trading. Yet the authority still lost one of the largest fraud cases ever heard in the English Commercial Court.

Tax news

MARCH 1, 2026 • 4 minute read

CJEU Case C-241/25: Why Sweden’s Withholding Tax Rules for Loss-Making Companies Could Face a Major EU Law Challenge

On 10 February 2026, the Grand Chamber of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) heard oral arguments in Case C-241/25, a potentially significant development for EU-based investors with exposure to Swedish equities. The case concerns whether Sweden can require foreign companies to recalculate their tax position under Swedish rules before reclaiming dividend withholding tax (WHT).

Tax news

MARCH 1, 2026 • 7 minute read

The Netherlands’ FGR Reform Remains in Flux: What Investment Funds and Tax Professionals Need to Know

The Dutch government’s reform of the fonds voor gemene rekening (FGR) regime continues to create uncertainty for investment funds with Dutch investors or Dutch-source income. What initially appeared to be a technical update to Dutch fund classification rules has evolved into a broader discussion about withholding tax exposure, cross-border investment structures, and the future of tax transparency in the Netherlands.

Tax news